De mogelijke gevolgen van abortus

Borstkanker

Is er een verhoogde kans op borstkanker?

Rijping van de borstmodule

Type 3 & 4 = cancer resistant

Tijdens een zwangerschap, worden extra cellen aangemaakt in de borsten. Sommige vrouwen merken dat hun borsten groter worden. Deze extra cellen zijn in eerste instantie “undifferentiated” – ongedifferentieerd – weten nog niet wat ze gaan doen. Het is pas tijdens het 3e trimester (na 24 weken/6 maanden) dat deze cellen gedifferentieerd worden en weten “we gaan melk produceren”.

Gedifferentieerde cellen bieden meer bescherming tegen borstkanker. 

Press statement

Dr Berning:

Complications are underreported.

1. The operative note says “ruptured ectopic pregnancy and internal hemmorrhage” – but the real cause is abortion.

2. The autopsy states “cause of death: overwhelming sepsis” – the real cause is abortion.

3. The medical diagnosis is “severe pain” – the real cause is abortion.

4. The record reads “vaginal bleeding” – the real cause is abortion.

https://afterabortion.org/abortionists-are-not-held-accountable-for-mistakes/

Premature birth

Abortion can affect the woman, her family, but also society. An example: more premature births in pregnancies that follow. The 2009 Dr Prakesh Shah systematic review meta analysis study reported that women with exactly 1 prior induced abortion have 36% higher odds of a preterm birth compared to women with zero induced abortions. Women with more than 1 induced abortion have 93% higher odds of a ‘preemie’ delivery. So, in a country in which women without induced abortions have a 10% premature birth rate, women with more than one prior induced abortion would have an absolute ‘preemie’ risk of 19.3% (1.93 x 10%).
Reference Shah PS, Zao J. Induced termination of pregnancy and low birthweight and preterm birth: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG [British Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology] 2009;116:1425-1442 http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2009.02278.x/pdf

Yet it is touted as ‘safe’.

Premature babies under 37 weeks gestation have an elevated risk of [MACE] mental retardation, autism, cerebral palsy, epilepsy, deafness, blindness, lung impairment, and serious infections, costing governments billions in healthcare. There are other studies for example Swingle, and a study from
McGill University, which found that, on average, women who had one prior induced abortion were 45% more likely to have premature births by 32 weeks, 71% more likely to have premature births by 28 weeks, and 117% more likely to have premature births by 26 weeks.

Even in the Netherlands, Van Ankum of the AMC Academic Hospital is cited as saying: “One fifth of the women who have undergone a curettage suffer from adhesions. The chance of a premature birth at the next pregnancy also increases. The differences were impressive: the chance of a birth
earlier than 37 weeks increases by 30%, that of a birth earlier than 32 weeks even by 70%.”

https://mediator.zonmw.nl/mediator-28-april-2018/ik-hoop-dat-het-aantal-curettages-afneemt/
(the same operation for miscarriage or abortion).

‘Cost Consequences of Induced Abortion as an Attributable Risk for Preterm Birth and Impact on Informed Consent’ concludes “Induced abortion contributes to significantly increased neonatal health costs by causing 31.5% of early preterm births.”

Who will pay the tab of all the weeks hospitalization of babies needing to be in neo-natal units in hospitals?

“Safe”

What exactly do you mean: safe?

The word “safe” is actually a cloudy term, and actually means they want it “legal”.

Maatschappij

Wordt later toegevoegd